Skip to Content
scroll

BetaShares S&P Global High Dividend Aristocrats ETF (ASX: INCM) & VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (ASX: QUAL)

Our Q&As are emailed in our Saturday Morning Report, find the answer to this question below.

The Latest Q&A

Question asked

BetaShares S&P Global High Dividend Aristocrats ETF (ASX: INCM) & VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (ASX: QUAL)

Would Market Matters consider INCM for the income portfolio? I'd be interested in your views for and against its consideration. How would you rate this ETF in comparison to QUAL?

Answer

Hi Angela,

Firstly, comparing the two ETFs: the QUAL and INCM offer two different approaches to international equities, QUAL focuses on quality and long-term capital growth, while INCM prioritises dividend income. Both invest in global shares excluding Australia, they are unhedged and charge similar management fees of 0.40% and 0.39% p.a. respectively.

  • QUAL – Quality and growth: Invests in ~300 financially strong global companies with high profitability, low debt and consistent earnings. With around A$9.1bn in assets, it has significant scale and an established track record, delivering approximately 15.5% p.a. over the decade to June 2026. However, its heavy exposure to US technology stocks could leave it vulnerable if growth stocks continue to fall out of favour.
  • INCM – Dividend income: Holds ~190 global companies with a history of maintaining or increasing dividends, offering a trailing yield of around 5%, paid quarterly. Importantly, INCM changed its investment strategy in August 2025, adopting a more diversified dividend-focused approach, meaning earlier performance figures are not directly comparable. With ~A$115mn in assets, it’s considerably smaller than QUAL.

We favour QUAL as a core international equity holding for investors seeking long-term capital growth, given its disciplined quality approach, track record and scale. INCM is better suited to income-focused investors, looking for ASX diversification, seeking regular quarterly distributions but note a higher dividend yield doesn’t necessarily translate into a better total return.

In terms of our Income Portfolio, we haven’t traditionally used ETFs, preferring to create a blended portfolio of stocks and listed credit which since 2017 has delivered ~9.7% a year, but importantly, with a lot less volatility than the broader stock market.

chart
image description
BetaShares S&P Global High Dividend Aristocrats ETF (INCM) vs. VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (QUAL)
image description

Relevant suggested news and content from the site

Back to top